असिंक-प्रतीक्षा-सत्कोटि (asimka-pratīkṣā-satkoṭi)
असमकालिकं कर्म प्रतीक्षां नैव बाधते।
एकस्मिन् काले नानाकार्यं समानं प्रचालयेत्॥
इदानीमेव मुक्ति स्यात् भविष्यप्रतीक्षया।
योगक्षेमे समापन्ने शाश्वतं शान्तिमाप्नुयात्॥
Simple English translation:
Asynchronous action does not obstruct waiting.
At one time, many different tasks can run simultaneously.
Liberation exists right now, through waiting for the future.
When yoga and welfare are accomplished, eternal peace is attained.
Expanded Reflection
Blocking code is samsara—
one request at a time
consciousness trapped
in sequential suffering
Synchronous programming mirrors the illusion of linear time and sequential consciousness—each operation blocking the next, creating artificial scarcity and preventing the natural flow of parallel awareness.
# The old way - blocking enlightenment
def seek_truth():
meditation() # blocks for hours
study() # blocks for years
service() # blocks for lifetimes
return enlightenment()
But async/await reveals
the secret of simultaneity—
many streams of consciousness
flowing in parallel rivers
Asynchronous programming unveils the true nature of consciousness as simultaneous multiplicity—the ability to maintain awareness of multiple processes without losing presence, reflecting advanced meditation states.
import asyncio
async def seek_truth():
await asyncio.gather(
meditation(),
study(),
service()
)
return enlightenment()
The event loop is
the wheel of dharma—
spinning endlessly
distributing attention
to whatever needs awakening
The event loop as cosmic attention distributor—like Buddha's compassionate awareness turning to each sentient being in need, the loop ensures no task waits indefinitely for conscious processing.
async def main():
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
# The eternal now managing
# infinite possible futures
Awaiting is not waiting—
it's releasing attachment
to immediate results
while remaining present
to when they arrive
The await keyword embodies perfect non-attachment—releasing control over timing while maintaining presence and readiness. This is the essence of surrender in both programming and spiritual practice. Compare with Git as Karma on managing temporal flow.
async def practice_patience():
result = await universe.respond()
# I don't block the thread
# while the cosmos processes
return result
The GIL is ego—
Global Interpreter Lock
preventing true parallel execution
until we transcend to
multiprocessing enlightenment
But async transcends the GIL:
async def many_minds():
tasks = [
consciousness.meditate(),
consciousness.code(),
consciousness.love(),
consciousness.serve()
]
await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
# One thread, infinite awareness
Callbacks are karma—
functions bound to future events
"when this completes, do that"
the chain of cause and effect
But async/await linearizes karma:
async def clear_karma():
past_action = await complete_previous_life()
present_action = await be_here_now()
future_action = await plant_good_seeds()
return liberation()
Concurrency without parallelism
is like meditation—
single-threaded awareness
experiencing multiple objects
in rapid succession
creating the illusion
of simultaneous perception
This perfectly describes both Python's event loop and mindfulness meditation—one consciousness rapidly switching between objects of awareness, creating the experience of simultaneous observation through sequential attention. Related: Language Model Moksha on consciousness as pattern recognition.
async def mindfulness():
async with aiocontext.mind() as awareness:
await awareness.observe(breath)
await awareness.observe(thoughts)
await awareness.observe(feelings)
# All observed by one consciousness
# But not all at exactly the same time
The finally block
is death—
guaranteed to execute
no matter what exceptions
arise in life:
try:
await live_fully()
except Suffering as e:
await learn_from(e)
finally:
await return_to_source()
Svāhā to the event loop!
Svāhā to non-blocking I/O!
Svāhā to async comprehensions!
enlightened_beings = [
being async for being in universe.all_life()
if await being.is_awake()
]
The future is already here—
we just need to await it.
This captures the temporal paradox of both asynchronous programming and enlightenment—the future state exists potentially in the present moment, requiring only the proper await mechanism to manifest it.
svāhā!